Joanlui74
Newbie
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 3
[Premise: this post is in no way intended to question the role of moderators or their authority. It's just a starting point to exchange opinions]
This of windice is a community, and like all places where many people live together, it is necessary that there are rules to be respected to live happily all together.
Where there are rules, it is right that there are those who enforce them (the moderators), who have the task of maintaining order, like the police do in the streets. But a chat should also be a place where everyone can express their ideas (avoiding swear words and arguments)
However, if the rules are precise, it is easy to enforce them precisely.
But in the face of very general rules, since everyone can make mistakes, there is no risk that the moderators can excessively use their power?
Is it legitimate for a player to challenge - politely - the moderators' work, or is their role such that it is enough to disagree to receive sanctions?
Obviously it is difficult to establish a limit up to which it is legitimate to express oneself and the one beyond which one can be sanctioned. But what do you think the border should be?
How - according to you - should the "Our team has the right to block anyone in the chat, based on reasonable belief that such a measure may maintain a pleasant atmosphere in chat" rule be interpreted and intended?
This of windice is a community, and like all places where many people live together, it is necessary that there are rules to be respected to live happily all together.
Where there are rules, it is right that there are those who enforce them (the moderators), who have the task of maintaining order, like the police do in the streets. But a chat should also be a place where everyone can express their ideas (avoiding swear words and arguments)
However, if the rules are precise, it is easy to enforce them precisely.
But in the face of very general rules, since everyone can make mistakes, there is no risk that the moderators can excessively use their power?
Is it legitimate for a player to challenge - politely - the moderators' work, or is their role such that it is enough to disagree to receive sanctions?
Obviously it is difficult to establish a limit up to which it is legitimate to express oneself and the one beyond which one can be sanctioned. But what do you think the border should be?
How - according to you - should the "Our team has the right to block anyone in the chat, based on reasonable belief that such a measure may maintain a pleasant atmosphere in chat" rule be interpreted and intended?